Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 13 of 13

Thread: Lost with DB scheme - tried to solve NO_SUCH_ITEM

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Greenwood, IN
    Posts
    90
    Rep Power
    10

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by juergenmw View Post
    ok, it seems there is an message with id 6482 in the response. When I debug my local IMAP Client it tells me the remote ID is 5311.
    The mail_item_dumpster table is completly empty. Maybe it is related to the tagged_item somehow?

    BR
    I wonder if you might try looking for either one of those ids in the mail_item table. Maybe we can figure this out from that.
    --
    Jason Bryan
    Zimbra R&D

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    27
    Rep Power
    7

    Default

    Ok - I've found the one with the ID 6482 in the mail_item but no success in any other table?
    Where does the WebGUI get the info "unread message" from?

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Greenwood, IN
    Posts
    90
    Rep Power
    10

    Default

    Sorry for the delay. mail_item.unread = 1 means the item is unread. Marking the item read sets the field value to 0.
    --
    Jason Bryan
    Zimbra R&D

Similar Threads

  1. New 6.0 NE backup scheme
    By mfvm in forum Administrators
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-13-2010, 04:56 AM
  2. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 05-26-2010, 05:51 AM
  3. What is the logical scheme of INVID ?
    By Michael REMY in forum Developers
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-28-2010, 02:01 AM
  4. Cluster partition scheme
    By freefall in forum Installation
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 07-25-2007, 12:05 PM
  5. mail.NO_SUCH_ITEM
    By shideg in forum Administrators
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 03-28-2007, 10:24 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •