Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Dkim 2

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    44
    Rep Power
    4

    Default Dkim 2

    I had issues with Dkim in the past and evetually got it working with as notated here;
    Thank you phoenix!

    However I recently upgraded from 8.0 to 8.0.4 and installed the patch and just noticed that my DKIM is no longer working... I decided to revisit the opendkim wiki and just run through the steps really quick to make sure everything was still setup correctly.
    Guide to Install OpenDKIM for multiple domains with Postfix and Debian

    But I get the following results;
    ================================================== ========
    Summary of Results
    ================================================== ========
    SPF check: pass
    DomainKeys check: neutral
    DKIM check: neutral
    Sender-ID check: pass
    SpamAssassin check: ham
    I do have the milter checkbox checked in Zimbra Admin, but I get no joy with openDKim anymore...

    If I check my dkim at;
    Dkim Checker
    I get the following;
    This is a valid DKIM key record
    Version
    v= DKIM1
    Key type
    k= rsa
    Public key
    p= MIGfMA0GCS.....

    netstat -antup | grep 12345
    tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:12345 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 9939/opendkim
    Can anyone see what is going on here?

  2. #2
    phoenix is offline Zimbra Consultant & Moderator
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Vannes, France
    Posts
    23,587
    Rep Power
    58

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cartaysm View Post
    Can anyone see what is going on here?
    You need to remove those changes to ZCS (Postfix) and follow the wiki guide on Configuring for DKIM Signing - openDKIM is built into ZCS 8.x and works well if you follow that guide.
    Regards


    Bill


    Acompli: A new adventure for Co-Founder KevinH.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    44
    Rep Power
    4

    Default

    That was it, thank you again!!!

    ================================================== ========
    Summary of Results
    ================================================== ========
    SPF check: pass
    DomainKeys check: neutral
    DKIM check: pass
    Sender-ID check: pass
    SpamAssassin check: ham

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    44
    Rep Power
    4

    Default

    On a side note, Does his header look okay? It seems as though there are a lot of "Received" in it.
    Delivered-To: me
    Received: by 10.66.4.168 with SMTP id l8csp48988pal;
    Fri, 23 Aug 2013 11:47:02 -0700 (PDT)
    X-Received: by 10.50.128.36 with SMTP id nl4mr805618igb.38.1377283622320;
    Fri, 23 Aug 2013 11:47:02 -0700 (PDT)
    Return-Path: <>
    Received: from )
    by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d10si672146icy.59.1969.12.31.16.00.00;
    Fri, 23 Aug 2013 11:47:02 -0700 (PDT)
    Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of as permitted sender) client-ip=;
    Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
    spf=pass (google.com: domain of d as permitted sender) smtp.mail=;
    dkim=pass header.i=@
    Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
    by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B1B02FE8C7
    for <>; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 14:47:01 -0400 (EDT)
    Received: from ([127.0.0.1])
    by localhost ( [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032)
    with ESMTP id NxFD3ARAHppt for <>;
    Fri, 23 Aug 2013 14:47:01 -0400 (EDT)
    Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
    by (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA4CB2FE8C5
    for <>; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 14:47:00 -0400 (EDT)
    DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.8.0 EA4CB2FE8C5
    DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=.com;
    s=442548B8-0C22-11E3-82F9-370D9326A832; t=1377283620;
    bh=8XQYIxIa5xHSBR3hYew0XmnKkRLlZjJI3+CF3WeOAKY=;
    h=Date:From:To:Message-ID:Subject:MIME-Version:Content-Type;
    b=B1JtQwMW/
    X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
    Received: from .com ([127.0.0.1])
    by localhost (.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026)
    with ESMTP id 6I6ahoT71z3i for <>;
    Fri, 23 Aug 2013 14:47:00 -0400 (EDT)
    Received: from
    by .com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C63092FE8AD
    for <>; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 14:47:00 -0400 (EDT)

  5. #5
    phoenix is offline Zimbra Consultant & Moderator
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Vannes, France
    Posts
    23,587
    Rep Power
    58

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cartaysm View Post
    On a side note, Does his header look okay? It seems as though there are a lot of "Received" in it.
    It looks OK to me.
    Regards


    Bill


    Acompli: A new adventure for Co-Founder KevinH.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    44
    Rep Power
    4

    Default

    Thank you!

Similar Threads

  1. DKIM on Ver 7.2.1?
    By fairch in forum Administrators
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 11-25-2012, 08:49 AM
  2. DKIM on Ver 7.2.1?
    By fairch in forum Installation
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-23-2012, 07:20 PM
  3. Dkim
    By cartaysm in forum Administrators
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 07-17-2012, 12:02 PM
  4. DKIM Signature
    By ashrocks in forum Users
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-03-2010, 11:51 AM
  5. DKIM Coming?
    By LMStone in forum Developers
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 08-21-2009, 05:50 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •