Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: AjaxTK vs Backbase client implementation

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Leiden, .nl
    Posts
    1
    Rep Power
    10

    Default AjaxTK vs Backbase client implementation

    Is the browser to server communication open enough to allow for other client (browser) implementations than AjaxTK ?

    Having some experience in the Backbase Presentation Client (backbase.com) i'd like to explore using that rather than learning a whole new library.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    San Mateo, CA
    Posts
    4,789
    Rep Power
    19

    Default

    Yes. All the browser <-> server comunication is over SOAP/XML. You can see the actual requests and respones if you append ?debug=1 in the address bar. Or you can type "$set:debug 1" into the search bar which will turn on debug.

    The full SOAP api is explained in the source at ZimbraServer/docs/soap.txt

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 12
    Last Post: 08-25-2010, 03:37 AM
  2. [SOLVED] SOAP access to the Zimbra server
    By sahuguet in forum Developers
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 04-10-2008, 08:34 AM
  3. Deploying Zimbra Client (zimbra.war)
    By zocs in forum Installation
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 07-25-2007, 06:24 AM
  4. Moving Zimbra Web Client from one port to another.
    By oopstu in forum Administrators
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-20-2007, 02:47 AM
  5. Zimbra XUL/AJAX rich client?
    By voidless in forum Users
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 10-08-2005, 01:22 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •