Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: AjaxTK vs Backbase client implementation

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Leiden, .nl
    Rep Power

    Default AjaxTK vs Backbase client implementation

    Is the browser to server communication open enough to allow for other client (browser) implementations than AjaxTK ?

    Having some experience in the Backbase Presentation Client ( i'd like to explore using that rather than learning a whole new library.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    San Mateo, CA
    Rep Power


    Yes. All the browser <-> server comunication is over SOAP/XML. You can see the actual requests and respones if you append ?debug=1 in the address bar. Or you can type "$set:debug 1" into the search bar which will turn on debug.

    The full SOAP api is explained in the source at ZimbraServer/docs/soap.txt

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 12
    Last Post: 08-25-2010, 02:37 AM
  2. [SOLVED] SOAP access to the Zimbra server
    By sahuguet in forum Developers
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 04-10-2008, 07:34 AM
  3. Deploying Zimbra Client (zimbra.war)
    By zocs in forum Installation
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 07-25-2007, 05:24 AM
  4. Moving Zimbra Web Client from one port to another.
    By oopstu in forum Administrators
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-20-2007, 01:47 AM
  5. Zimbra XUL/AJAX rich client?
    By voidless in forum Users
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 10-08-2005, 12:22 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts