Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Port 7025 - Safe for Internet Exposure?

Threaded View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    2
    Rep Power
    6

    Default Port 7025 - Safe for Internet Exposure?

    Hello,

    I just installed a Zimbra Open Source 5.0.13 on Ubuntu 8.0.4 to evaluate and learn on. Everything went well except for messages being deferred because the MTA was attempting to connect to my external firewall interface instead of locally. I read up on the problem, and applied an alias with the public address that the MTA was trying to connect to on my network adapter as suggested in the wiki. The end result was all sorts of oddness. I couldn't connect to the server's webmail interface from the internal network, opening programs at the console (ex: terminal) show "Opening 0" in the taskbar and then disappear. I rebooted to clear the alias and everything returned to normal. If I forward the port from my firewall, everything works fine and mail arrives in a timely fashion.

    My question:

    Is it safe to leave port 7025 exposed to the Internet?
    If not, can anyone point me in the right direction in terms of applying the alias?

    The alias command I ran is: sudo ifconfig eth1:0 xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx netmask 255.255.255.255 up

    Edit:

    I am giving the alias another try. This time I am not experiencing any oddness with opening programs on the system, but Zimbra is showing the same results.

    My ifconfig output:

    eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:0e:a6:e0:ff:9b
    inet addr:192.168.0.252 Bcast:192.168.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
    inet6 addr: fe80::20e:a6ff:fee0:ff9b/64 Scope:Link
    UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
    RX packets:19051 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
    TX packets:26491 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
    collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
    RX bytes:1307065 (1.2 MB) TX bytes:24988893 (23.8 MB)
    Interrupt:18

    eth1:0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:0e:a6:e0:ff:9b
    inet addr:xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx Bcast:xxx.xxx.xxx.255 Mask:255.255.255.255 (xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx = my public IP)
    UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
    Interrupt:18

    lo Link encap:Local Loopback
    inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
    inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host
    UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1
    RX packets:17506 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
    TX packets:17506 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
    collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
    RX bytes:5661674 (5.3 MB) TX bytes:5661674 (5.3 MB)

    With these settings applied, the web interface times out with "cannot connect to server" as the error. I'm guessing it's directing it's resonses for external hosts trying to connect back unto itself because it thinks it is that public IP. Though the computers I am trying to connect from are on the 192.168.0.0 internal subnet. I'm sure I'm missing something basic here. Must need more coffee.
    Last edited by Techmonkey; 02-25-2009 at 10:28 AM.

Similar Threads

  1. connection refused port 7025 - what is this?
    By pheonix1t in forum Administrators
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 10-11-2011, 04:37 AM
  2. Erorr..initializing ldap failed(5362)
    By Logan_filter in forum Installation
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 12-19-2008, 12:10 PM
  3. zmclamdctl is not running after upgrade
    By Darren in forum Installation
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 10-10-2008, 09:10 AM
  4. Error 256 on Installation
    By RuinExplorer in forum Installation
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 10-19-2006, 09:19 AM
  5. Getting problems in FC4 while instalation
    By kitty_bhoo in forum Installation
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 09-12-2006, 10:34 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •